Outlander was one of the very first books I downloaded onto my Kindle (Wirelessly! 656 pages in less than 60 seconds!). Everyone and my mother had mentioned reading it, so I thought I would too. (My mother didn't like it, but then again, she didn't like Lord of Scoundrels either.)
Anyway, I WANTED to like it. And I really, REALLY tried. I did! But it took me three months to get through the first two chapters. It was just so... DRY. I would read a few pages and try to get into it before giving up, but this book spent most of the summer collecting virtual dust in the archives of my Kindle. I didn't go back to it until I realized I was spending too much money on books and needed to read something I already owned.
That was about two weeks ago and I've now read something like 4,000 pages of the Outlander series. I'm about to start book five.
Outlander is one of those novels to which readers have a STRONG reaction, much like one's reaction to cilantro. LOVE or HATE. Nothing much in the middle.
I loved it.
I mean, honestly? It's a romance novel with time travel, Scottish history and men in kilts. How could I NOT love it? And then there's the added perk of having the voice in my head pronounce most of the Scottish accents in this book in either the voice of a drunken Sean Connery or like that SNL skit: "If it's not Scottish, it's Crrap!"
That being said, it really bugged me that I had such a hard time getting into it. It's rare that I start off NOT liking a book and then end up TOTALLY AND UTTERLY ADORING IT. So, being a wanna-be-novelist my own self, I set about figuring out why.
Now for the most part, I'm not overly critical of writing style. I'm interested in a good story, no matter how it gets on the page, (Hence my utter adoration for Charlain Harris's Sookie Stackhouse books, Twilight, etc.) but when I broke it down, page by page, the problem turned out to be simple:
Gabaldon takes the cardinal rule of fiction entirely too seriously. SHOW DON'T TELL is all verra well and good, but it shouldn't be employed at the exclusion of character and/or common sense.
It's also the reason this book is so. damn. long.
** Spoiler Alert - there are some quotes here, but I don't think they're much worse than what you'd read on the back of a book jacket **
For example, Claire, our bonny protagonist, a 27-year-old English nurse who accidentally time-travels back to 1743, has just found out that she's been summoned for questioning by an English Captain named Jonathan Randall. Claire knows this Captain to be a sadistic torturer. He is the most terrifying specimen of humanity the woman has ever encountered. When Dougal, the leader of the Scottish Clan that's been keeping Claire safe, informs her of the summons, this is her reaction to the news:.
I must have looked truly alarming, for [Dougal] jumped to his feet and came over to me.
"Put your head between your knees, lass," he instructed, pushing on the back of my neck, "'til the faintness passes off."
"I know what to do," I said irritably, doing it nonetheless. I closed me eyes, feeling the ebbing blood begin to throb in my temples again. The clammy sensation around my face and ears began to disappear, though my hands were still icy. ...
And while that is a perfectly lovely, not to mention medically accurate, description of hyperventilation, it might have been nice to know what Claire was THINKING. How about: I WAS SO SCARED I COULDN'T BREATHE. For a novel written in first person point of view, there is an awful lot of distance between the narrator and the action.
Another example:
We were nearly at the bottom [of the hill] when lack of food, the remnants of a hangover, and the general stresses of the day caught up with me. I came to lying on damp leaves, my head in my new husband's lap.
Wait. What? Oh... After the wedding ceremony, she promptly passes out! THAT's what happened. Why didn't she just SAY SO? Again, no mention of how Claire feels. I can't tell you how much it BUGGED me to only find out how Claire felt about something AFTER it happened to her. I wanted the pleasure of being inside her head in a more connected way. I mean, the reader doesn't learn that she's even attracted to Jamie until AFTER she marries him and then she admits that, well, the thought of doing the dirty with him HAD crossed her mind...
Because I knew this was a romance, I kept waiting for the hero to appear and when he finally did, I felt bad for spending something like 300 pages with the poor bloke without knowing he was The One. I wanted that first rush of attraction to be on the page and it wasn't. The reader sees the action through Claire's EYES, but we aren't necessarily seeing it through the filter of her EMOTIONS. The good thing, though, is that you don't have to care about Claire much or worry about the writing style to LOVE this book.
Jamie Fraser makes this book worth reading.
He's perhaps my most favorite romance novel hero of all time - smart (multilingual even), morally noble without being self-righteous, stubborn, tortured (figuratively AND literally) and verra verra nekkid under that plaid skirt. Also - a virgin! He marries the good lass for three reasons: 1) to keep her safe from Black Jack Randall, 2) Because "Perhaps it's just that I want to bed you. ... Did ye think of that?" and 3) for luuuuurve:
"There was another reason. The main one."
"Reason?" I said stupidly.
"Why I married you."
"Which was?" I don't know what I expected him to say, perhaps some further revelation of his family's contorted affairs. What he did say was more of a shock, in its way.
"Because I wanted you." He turned from the window to face me. "More than I ever wanted anything in my life," he added softly.
I continued staring at him, dumbstruck. Whatever I had been expecting, it wasn't this. Seeing my openmouthed expression, he continued lightly, "When I asked my Da how ye knew which was the right woman, he told me when the time came, I'd have no doubt. And I didn't. When I woke in the dark under that tree on the road Leoch, with you sitting on my chest, cursing me for bleeding to death, I said to myself, "Jamie Fraser, for all ye canna see what she looks like, and for all she weighs as much as a good draft horse, this is the woman.'"
I started toward him, and he backed away, talking rapidly. "I said to myself, 'She's mended ye twice in as many hours, me lad; life amongst the MacKenzies being what it is, it might be well to wed a woman as can stanch a wound and set broken bones.' And I said to myself, 'Jamie, lad, if her touch feels so bonny on your collarbone, imagine what it might feel like lower down...'"
Och, Jamie, dinna fash yourself, lad, ye had me at hello.